MT/T 547-2006 转子式混凝土喷射机
作者:标准资料网 时间:2024-05-15 20:26:47 浏览:9618
来源:标准资料网
下载地址: 点击此处下载
基本信息
| 标准名称： | 转子式混凝土喷射机 |
| 英文名称： | Rotor concrete spraying machine |
| 中标分类： | 矿业 >> 矿山机械设备 >> 建井设备 |
| ICS分类： | |
| 替代情况： | 替代MT/T 547-1996 |
| 发布部门： | 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会 |
| 发布日期： | 2006-03-07 |
| 实施日期： | 2006-08-01 |
| 首发日期： | |
| 作废日期： | |
| 主管部门： | 国家发展和改革委员会 |
| 提出单位： | 中国煤炭工业协会科技发展部 |
| 归口单位： | 煤炭行业煤矿专用设备标准化技术委员会 |
| 起草单位： | 煤炭科学总院、南京所 |
| 起草人： | 虞家祥、亲德怀、肖华辉、王竹梅、刘加其、朱德俊 |
| 出版社： | 中国煤炭工业出版社 |
| 出版日期： | 2006-08-01 |
| 页数： | 8页 |
适用范围
本标准规定了转子式混凝土喷射机的术语和定义、产品分类、要求、试验方法、检验规则、标志、包装、运输和贮存。
本标准适用于转子式混凝土喷射机。
前言
没有内容
目录
没有内容
引用标准
没有内容
所属分类： 矿业 矿山机械设备 建井设备
下载地址: 点击此处下载
Product Code:SAE JA1000/1
Title:Reliability Program Standard Implementation Guide
Issuing Committee:G-11r, Reliability Committee
Scope:The importance of reliability in design engineering has significantly grown since the early Sixties. Competition has been a primary driver in this growth. The three realities of competition today are: world class quality and reliability, cost-effectiveness, and fast time-to-market. Formerly, companies could effectively compete if they could achieve at least two of these features in their products and product development processes, often at the expense of the third. However, customers today, whether military, aerospace, or commercial, have been sensitized to a higher level of expectation and demand products that are highly reliable, yet affordable. Product development practices are shifting in response to this higher level of expectation. Today, there is seldom time, or necessary resources to extensively test, analyze, and fix to achieve high quality and reliability. It is also true that the rapid growth in technology prevents the accumulation of historical data on the field performance of their products. Unfortunately, some reliability methods have depended upon the availability of historical data, other experiential information, or learning through extensive and time consuming tests. Unfortunately, some reliability methods have depended upon the availability of historical data, other experiential information, or learning through extensive and time consuming tests.To enable this transition, reliability efforts must be directed toward anticipating problems and designing-in features that assure the achievement of quality and reliability, concurrent with the development process, instead of trying to assess quality and reliability downstream. The gains in time-to-market and cost savings from such an approach can be significant. More recent reliability programs tend not to prescribe reliability tasks or methods to be performed by suppliers. Rather, suppliers are considered equal partners in the effort to produce a reliable product and work with the companies in deciding which reliability methods provide most value in achieving objectives.Nevertheless, developing reliable products and achieving reliability goals often requires different approaches for various product sectors. For example, in the defense/aerospace sector, the number of customers is relatively small. The product development cycle may span several years, while the product life cycle may last from mere minutes to as long as decades. Furthermore, it is not unusual for several design iterations of technologically different hardware and software to be developed before the final version is incorporated into the production product. Production volumes may range from rates of less than ten to hundreds per year. Also, the reliability discipline in this sector is generally a separate activity from the design discipline. The commercial sector, in contrast to the defense/aerospace sector, usually has a higher number of different customers. Development cycles could range from months to a few years while life cycles are often measured in years. Production volumes may run up to thousands per day. The reliability discipline is treated usually as an integral part of the up-front design process rather than a separate activity. Thus, developing a reliability implementation guide to meet the needs of all industry sectors is a formidable challenge. It recognized that this Guide will not strictly apply to all situations or industries. The suggestions made in this Guide must be interpreted in the context of the industry, its accepted practices, and unique company policies. This point cannot be overemphasized and this document does not attempt to prescribe any given method or set of methods. There is no right answer that will apply across the board to every organization or every product development. Suppliers and customers need to determine which methods are most applicable to their specific product developments."【英文标准名称】:ClassificationforServiceabilityofanOfficeFacilityforThermalEnvironmentandIndoorAirConditions
【原文标准名称】:热环境和室内空气条件下用办公室设施的适用性分类
【标准号】:ANSI/ASTME2320-2004
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:美国
【发布日期】:2004-07-05
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:美国国家标准学会(US-ANSI)
【起草单位】:ASTM
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:室内;热环境;适用性;空气;办公室;条件;分类
【英文主题词】:Air;Airconditioninginstallations;Classification;Conditions;Indoors;Offices;Serviceability;Thermalenvironment;Ventilationsystems
【摘要】:Thisclassificationcontainspairsofscalesforclassifyinganaspectoftheserviceabilityofanofficefacility,thatis,thecapabilityofanofficefacilitytomeetcertainpossiblerequirementsforsuitablethermalenvironmentandindoorairconditions.
【中国标准分类号】:Y80
【国际标准分类号】:91_140_30
【页数】:
【正文语种】:英语
Title:Reliability Program Standard Implementation Guide
Issuing Committee:G-11r, Reliability Committee
Scope:The importance of reliability in design engineering has significantly grown since the early Sixties. Competition has been a primary driver in this growth. The three realities of competition today are: world class quality and reliability, cost-effectiveness, and fast time-to-market. Formerly, companies could effectively compete if they could achieve at least two of these features in their products and product development processes, often at the expense of the third. However, customers today, whether military, aerospace, or commercial, have been sensitized to a higher level of expectation and demand products that are highly reliable, yet affordable. Product development practices are shifting in response to this higher level of expectation. Today, there is seldom time, or necessary resources to extensively test, analyze, and fix to achieve high quality and reliability. It is also true that the rapid growth in technology prevents the accumulation of historical data on the field performance of their products. Unfortunately, some reliability methods have depended upon the availability of historical data, other experiential information, or learning through extensive and time consuming tests. Unfortunately, some reliability methods have depended upon the availability of historical data, other experiential information, or learning through extensive and time consuming tests.To enable this transition, reliability efforts must be directed toward anticipating problems and designing-in features that assure the achievement of quality and reliability, concurrent with the development process, instead of trying to assess quality and reliability downstream. The gains in time-to-market and cost savings from such an approach can be significant. More recent reliability programs tend not to prescribe reliability tasks or methods to be performed by suppliers. Rather, suppliers are considered equal partners in the effort to produce a reliable product and work with the companies in deciding which reliability methods provide most value in achieving objectives.Nevertheless, developing reliable products and achieving reliability goals often requires different approaches for various product sectors. For example, in the defense/aerospace sector, the number of customers is relatively small. The product development cycle may span several years, while the product life cycle may last from mere minutes to as long as decades. Furthermore, it is not unusual for several design iterations of technologically different hardware and software to be developed before the final version is incorporated into the production product. Production volumes may range from rates of less than ten to hundreds per year. Also, the reliability discipline in this sector is generally a separate activity from the design discipline. The commercial sector, in contrast to the defense/aerospace sector, usually has a higher number of different customers. Development cycles could range from months to a few years while life cycles are often measured in years. Production volumes may run up to thousands per day. The reliability discipline is treated usually as an integral part of the up-front design process rather than a separate activity. Thus, developing a reliability implementation guide to meet the needs of all industry sectors is a formidable challenge. It recognized that this Guide will not strictly apply to all situations or industries. The suggestions made in this Guide must be interpreted in the context of the industry, its accepted practices, and unique company policies. This point cannot be overemphasized and this document does not attempt to prescribe any given method or set of methods. There is no right answer that will apply across the board to every organization or every product development. Suppliers and customers need to determine which methods are most applicable to their specific product developments."【英文标准名称】:ClassificationforServiceabilityofanOfficeFacilityforThermalEnvironmentandIndoorAirConditions
【原文标准名称】:热环境和室内空气条件下用办公室设施的适用性分类
【标准号】:ANSI/ASTME2320-2004
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:美国
【发布日期】:2004-07-05
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:美国国家标准学会(US-ANSI)
【起草单位】:ASTM
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:室内;热环境;适用性;空气;办公室;条件;分类
【英文主题词】:Air;Airconditioninginstallations;Classification;Conditions;Indoors;Offices;Serviceability;Thermalenvironment;Ventilationsystems
【摘要】:Thisclassificationcontainspairsofscalesforclassifyinganaspectoftheserviceabilityofanofficefacility,thatis,thecapabilityofanofficefacilitytomeetcertainpossiblerequirementsforsuitablethermalenvironmentandindoorairconditions.
【中国标准分类号】:Y80
【国际标准分类号】:91_140_30
【页数】:
【正文语种】:英语